Science & Faith
Nobody Knows How Life Started
Chemistry does not simply become biology. That is the problem.
Here is a question that sounds simple but has confounded the brightest minds on the planet for over 70 years: how did life start?
Not how did life evolve — that is a different question. How did the very first living cell arise from non-living chemistry? How did inert molecules become alive?
Nobody knows.
The Miller-Urey Experiment (1953)
In 1953, Stanley Miller and Harold Urey ran a famous experiment. They simulated what they believed was Earth's early atmosphere, applied electrical discharge, and produced some amino acids — the building blocks of proteins.
Headlines declared victory. "Life created in a lab!" Textbooks still feature this experiment.
But here is what is often left out:
- They produced amino acids, not life. That is like claiming you built a house because you found some bricks in a field.
- The atmospheric composition they used was almost certainly wrong — the early Earth likely had a different gas mixture that does not produce amino acids as readily.
- Even the amino acids they obtained were a mix of types that life does not use (life exclusively uses left-handed amino acids; Miller produced both).
More than 70 years later, nobody has come remotely close to creating a living cell from scratch.
Why It Is So Difficult
The simplest living cell is incomprehensibly complex. Even the most basic bacteria require:
- DNA or RNA to store genetic information
- to read and execute that information